This November, Dallas voters will face a crucial decision on Proposition A, a charter amendment that could significantly impact the city’s civilian pension fund and its approximately 7,500 current and former employees.

Understanding the Issue

The proposed charter amendment addresses a $1.4 billion unfunded liability in the Employees’ Retirement Fund (ERF), which provides retirement benefits for non-uniformed city employees. The amendment would allow changes to the actuarially determined contributions from both employees and the city, a move officials say is necessary to ensure the long-term stability of the pension system.

“This is about securing the future for our civilian workforce while also protecting Dallas taxpayers,” said SOMEBODY. “Without these changes, the fund’s ability to meet its obligations to retirees could be at risk.”

What Proposition A Would Do

If approved, the charter amendment would:

  1. Enable adjustments to contribution rates for both the city and employees
  2. Allow for modifications to the pension benefit structure
  3. Implement more frequent actuarial reviews to ensure the fund stays on track

Currently, any changes to the city’s retirement fund rules require voter approval, as mandated by the city code.

It is important to note that this is separate from Police and Fire Pension.
City officials emphasize that this proposition is entirely separate from the police and fire pension system, which faces its own, more severe funding challenges. The civilian pension fund, while underfunded, is in relatively better shape than its counterpart for first responders.

Financial Impact

According to city financial advisors, addressing the shortfall now could save Dallas taxpayers millions in the long run. Without action, the unfunded liability could grow, potentially leading to:

  • Increased taxpayer burden
  • Reduced city services
  • Difficulty in recruiting and retaining quality employees

Employee Perspectives

The proposed changes have garnered mixed reactions from city employees. Rickey White Sr, a 15-year veteran of the city’s public works department, expressed cautious support: “We understand the need for change, but we also want to ensure our retirement security isn’t compromised.”

The local employee union has taken a neutral stance, acknowledging the need for reform while advocating for protections for current employees.

Next Steps

If voters approve Proposition A in November, the city council will work with pension board members, employee representatives, and financial experts to determine specific changes to contribution rates and benefits. Any modifications would require careful consideration of:

  • Long-term fund sustainability
  • Impact on current and future employees
  • City budget constraints

Voter Information

The proposition will appear on the November ballot. The city has scheduled several town hall meetings to educate voters on the issue and answer questions about the proposed changes.

For more information, voters can visit the city’s website or attend upcoming public forums:

  • October 15: Central Library, 6:00 PM
  • October 22: Pleasant Grove Recreation Center, 7:00 PM
  • October 29: Virtual Town Hall, accessible online