Overview:
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law by the Biden Administration, targets environmental programs and climate justice, rescinding the Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental and Climate Justice Program and jeopardizing $3 billion in grants. Environmental activists argue that the bill weakens the Clean Air Act, disables the EPA's ability to regulate toxic emissions, and disables protections for drinking water, and targets the same people who always suffer. A lawsuit filed by nonprofits has won the case against the EPA's attempt to unilaterally cancel its block grant, but the bill's environmental provisions remain a concern.
Among the many, many provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that was signed into law on the Fourth of July are a host of environmental measures that continue the Trump Administrationโs work to undo any and all progress on climate change. โIt is not an overstatement to say this is the most anti-environment bill in history,โ Patrick Drupp, director of climate policy for the Sierra Club, said in a statement.
And as the Biden Administration was very focused on environmental and climate justice in particular, the new bill targets many of those programs, too, and rescinds the Environmental Protection Agencyโs Environmental and Climate Justice Program entirely.
Environmental activist Mustafa Ali put it plainly: โThe bill greenlights pollution โ literally. It weakens the Clean Air Act, disables the EPAโs ability to regulate toxic emissions, and rolls back protections for drinking water. It tells corporations they can dump, poison, and profit without consequence. And who suffers? The same people who always suffer.โ Black, Brown, Indigenous, and low-income Americans.
Billions in Promised Grants Now in Jeopardy
Established through the Inflation Reduction Reduction Act, the program earmarked $2.8 billion in grants, and $200 million in technical assistance to invest in underserved communities โโ80 times more than any federal investment in environmental justice in history,โ Chandra Taylor-Sawyer, senior attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center, told Rolling Stone last year.
While many grants have already been paid out (which hasnโt stopped the EPA from attempting to take that money back), a significant amount of funding through the program remains unawarded. In February, a report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities said that over $1 billion in IRA environmental justice funding has not yet been obligated. The funding was supposed to remain available through September 30, 2026.
Lawsuits Push Back Against EPAโs Rollbacks
Green and Healthy Homes Initiative, which was named by the Biden Administration as a regional grantmakers for the Thriving Communities Grantmaking Program, one of a number of ways that the EPAโs IRA funds were being distributed, was one of three plaintiffs in a lawsuit against the EPA filed earlier this year after the agency tried to unilaterally cancel its block grant. The nonprofits won that suit last month.
โIn the bill that went through the House and Senate, the Senate amended to not repeal obligated funds, but only rescind non-obligated funds,โ explains Ruth Ann Norton, president of Green & Healthy Homes Initiative (GHHI). โOur funds are obligated, as our fourth-circuit ruling deemed. The cancellation of those grants was unlawful, in the words of the judge.โ
Fighting for Communities
The Maryland-based GHHI is in the process of distributing its block grant to community-based organizations throughout the mid-Atlantic, the region the Biden EPA put it in charge of. โWe do have about 111 identified subrecipients, 72 of which are fully contracted and have already started to draw on payments,โ Norton says. โThe whole reason that we work through this dispute is simply to ensure that communities have funds to address issues of environmental equality and to advance public health.โ
In another class-action lawsuit that was just filed in June, a similar argument is being made that the EPA canโt reclaim money that was congressionally allocated. That suit seeks to have some 350 previously awarded grants, totaling $3 billion, reinstated.
The End of a Short-Lived Climate Justice Era?
While thereโs a good chance that the legal argument will win there too, and the awarded grants will remain rewarded, the funding that was still available is now likely dead and gone โ and the all-too-short era of when the federal government made an effort to address climate justice, funneled billions of dollars into doing so, now seems even more squarely behind us.
โWe canโt lose our focus on mission,โ Norton said, โbut I donโt have an answer entirely where weโre gonna go for all of the money, cause even philanthropy doesnโt have enough money to backfill in many communities what government was otherwise funding.โ
The post The Big Beautiful Bill Is Bad for Climate Justice Too appeared first on Word in Black.
The post {{post title}}, https://wordinblack.com/2025/07/big-beautiful-bill-is-bad-climate-justice/ appeared first on Word in Black.ย
